StanCollender'sCapitalGainsandGames Washington, Wall Street and Everything in Between



The Pete Davis Archives

Debt Limit, Or Is It?

22 Feb 2011
Posted by Pete Davis
This afternoon, the Government Accountability Office issued a detailed report of what happened when the debt limit was not increased in time to avoid Treasury market disruptions between 1995 and 2010 and on what Treasury can do once it reaches the limit to avoid default.

Boehner Ups The Ante

18 Feb 2011
Posted by Pete Davis

Yesterday, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) ended his weekly news conference with:

QUESTION:
If the House and Senate can't reach agreement on -- on the CR by March 4th, would you be willing to entertain a short-term CR at current levels?

BOEHNER:
We're going to do everything that we can to cut spending. We're hopeful that the Senate will take up the House-passed bill that comes out of here today, tonight, tomorrow morning, whenever it is. But we hope that they will move it.

But our goal here is to cut spending. But I am not going to move any kind of short-term CR at current levels. When we -- when we say we're going to cut spending, read my lips. We're going to cut spending.

Thank you.
_________

I'm surprised he used "read my lips," because that's what President George H.W. Bush said to the Republican National Convention two years before cutting a deal to go back on his pledge not to raise taxes.

Posted by Pete Davis
A year ago, most states hoped the economy would be strong enough this year that they wouldn't have to cope with deficits like those of the past two years. Unfortunately, economic recovery has been weak and they face continued revenue shortfalls and the cessation of stimulus spending that sustained them through the recession. On February 3, National Governors Association Executive Director Ray Scheppach told the Senate Budget Committee that despite adopting $75 billion of spending cuts and $33 billion of tax increases over the past two years, the states will have to trim another $175 billion over the next few years. Today's Washington Post has this handy chart and detailed article showing what mostly new governors from both parties are up against and what they're proposing.

Charle Cook on 2012

31 Jan 2011
Posted by Pete Davis

Today, my favorite election expert Charlie Cook told clients and the press:

Posted by Pete Davis

It's too early to cheer, but I would note these recent small early signs of bipartisanship.

Posted by Pete Davis
Lowering corporate tax rates to make U.S. multinationals more competitive abroad is one way President Obama may improve his standing with business. Tomorrow, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner will meet with top business leaders to explore this possibility. President Obama may address the issue in his January 25 State of the Union Address and in his February 7 speech to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Here are some questions that I hope Mr. Geithner would ask.
 
1. How much do you want to lower the top corporate tax rate? Our current 35% top federal rate plus our 4.1% average state tax rate is the highest in the world along with that of Japan as shown in this Tax Foundation table based upon OECD data. Our European trading partners have comparable rates ranging from 30% to 34%, so we would have to lower our rate by at least 5% points to become comparable. U.S. multinationals overwhelmingly support lowering our corporate tax rates.
 
2. Should we move to a territorial tax system? That would allow U.S.
Posted by Pete Davis
Maya MacGuineas expressed optimism about seeing some deficit reduction this year in her speech to the National Economists Club at 12:30 p.m. yesterday.  Here's the summary of her remarks.
 
Scenarios for Fiscal Reform
 
Summary of remarks by
Maya MacGuineas
President,
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
January 6, 2011
 
Seven years ago, when I took over the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, Leon Panetta told me: "We're probably not going to actually be able to fix the deficit problem—but at least we’ll be able to say ‘I told you so’ after we lose." However, the positive reaction to the $4 trillion deficit reduction plan put forth last month by the President's Fiscal Responsibility and Reform Commission has given me new hope.
Posted by Pete Davis

You don't have to be a football fan to get pumped for this collision of political views.  I'll be watching.   Kickoff time is 6:25 p.m. Sunday, February 6.   Hotline broke the story today.

Posted by Pete Davis
Bloomberg's Ryan Donmoyer and Rich Miller report this morning that no decisions have been made yet whether President Obama will back tax reform.  They report Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner will meet January 14th with corporate CFOs to continue the discussion.
 
Yesterday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) told reporters, "The country is ripe for tax reform...our tax system is broken and needs to be fixed." He said it would be one of his first priorities.  Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) added, "We all know the tax code is a disaster, and any effort to simplify the tax code, to get the rates down to make it more fair, I think we'd be open to discussing that." House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) and House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) both called for tax reform earlier this week.
 
Wednesday, the White House told the Wall
Posted by Pete Davis
Congress will return on January 5th to battle over the budget for much of the year. The new House Republican majority (242R-193D) won't wait for the normal budget process to send the Senate weekly spending cuts, which the Senate won't take up. President Obama's State of the Union address (expected on January 25th) will be the next focal point, as will his FY12 Budget to be presented February 14th. The Budget Committees will produce resolutions that might pass their respective houses, but a compromise seems unlikely. The government is funded only through March 4th, so another continuing resolution will be required. The ultimate showdown will occur over extending the $14.294 trillion debt limit, probably by early March.
 
House Republicans will do away with the Gephardt rule that automatically passed a debt limit increase as part of the budget resolution. From now on, the House will have to explicitly vote on every debt limit increase. Since many Republicans and a few Democrats have long campaigned on never voting for a debt limit increase, passing one will be very difficult indeed. With the pre-Christmas $856 b.
Posted by Pete Davis

With this evening's 83-15 cloture vote, the Senate signaled it will pass President Obama's Bush tax cut compromise tomorrow afternoon or evening depending upon how much of the 30 hours for debate is used.  A top House staffer told me that one amendment on the estate tax will be considered when the House takes it up Wednesday afternoon or evening.  No details were offered, but I would guess we're talking about replacing the Lincoln-Kyl $5 million exemption and 35% top rate with the 2009 $3.5 million exemption and 45% top rate.  I'd be surprised if the Senate accepted that, so the question is how long will it take Congress to reach a compromise.  It's a tough call.  Most of my lobbyist friends expect the desire to get out of town will force final passage of the Senate version without the House amendment next weekend.  I'm not so sure.   Even if this Congress fails to reach a deal, the 112th Congress would pass the Senate version quickly after it convenes on January 5th.

Posted by Pete Davis

Now that Senate Democrats fell 7  votes short  of 60 yesterday on extending the Bush tax cuts only for those with incomes under $250,000 ($200,000 for singles) or under $1 million, the conventional wisdom says they will accept a two-year extension of the Bush tax cuts for everyone if unemployment benefits are extended too.  That's supposedly what has tentatively been agreed upon in the bipartisan talks with the White House.  I believe such a deal will be announced soon, but I remain skeptical about it chances for passing the Senate and the House.   What's to stop a filibuster by Senator Bernie Sanders (ID-VT) or other liberal Democrats?  Is there 60 votes for anything?  Until next January, it will take 18 Democrats to vote with all 42 Republicans to reach 60.  That's a lot of Democrats, many of whom are very much on the record as opposing an extension for those over $250,000.  And what about the House, where Democrats have a 255D-178R majority?  Are 39 House Democrats going to vote with all 178 Republicans?

Posted by Pete Davis

Stan and I both know Washington commissions rarely achieve much, so expecting this one to reach an agreement supported by 14 of 18 commissioners seems unrealistic to me. I expect Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson to admit as much at their 3:30 PM news conference this afternoon.

Posted by Pete Davis

I'll be on Bloomberg TV tomorrow talking to Peter Cook about the likelihood that 14 votes won't be found Wednesday morning on the President's Fiscal Responsiblity and Reform Commission to support any broad deficit reduction proposal. There's just too much distance between Commission Republicans and Democrats on raising revenue and cutting spending. That doesn't mean the effort will be wasted. Far from it.

Record Deficits

27 Nov 2010
Posted by Pete Davis

We're running deficits not seen since World War II, except the wars we're fighting aren't the main cause -- deep recession, costly stimulus, and runaway health costs are. After running surpluses for four years FY98-FY01, we ran deficits averaging 2.5% of GDP through FY08, 10.0% in FY09, and 8.9% in FY10 just ended. See Table F-2 on p. 127 of the CBO Budget and Economic Outlook. As the economy recovers weakly, the deficit will drop to 5% or 6% of GDP as revenues recover automatically and stimulus spending stops, assuming the Bush tax cuts, AMT relief, and the Doc Fix are extended permanently. That would leave us with a rapidly growing public debt and a weak economy that would be vulnerable to outside shocks, e.g. rising interest rates to finance the public debt and/or inflation, particularly for energy prices, which will rise as the dollar falls. Therefore, it is very important that we lower our deficits to the point where they are sustainable, where they aren't growing as a share of GDP. That would be about 3% of GDP.

Consensus???!!!

26 Nov 2010
Posted by Pete Davis

Consensus is hard to find in Washington these days. There wasn't that much just before before this month's election, and there is a lot less after it. President Obama is willing to compromise on extending the Bush tax cuts and on cutting spending, but many Democrats won't follow his lead. Similarly, any deals by soon-to-be House Speaker John Boehner are likely to run afoul of newly elected Tea Party Republicans or of a filibuster by their compatriots in the Senate. It's going to be very difficult to find 60 votes in the Senate for anything controversial during the next two years. The middle has gone out of American politics, and the extremes work against compromise.

Failure to govern can be a good thing if the ship of state is on a safe and sustainable course, but it isn't. Here's my short list of unsustainable U.S. policies:

1. Record deficits

2. Uncertain tax policies

3. Runaway health care costs

4. Overextended military operations

5. Poorly defended borders and counterproductive immigration policies

6. Failing K-12 schools

7. Burdensome litigation

QE2, Good Or Bad?

03 Nov 2010
Posted by Pete Davis

No, it's not the ocean liner. It's the Fed's second massive asset purchase, this time $600 billion of longer term Treasury bonds ($75 billion per month over the next eight months), just announced this afternoon. QE2 stands for "quantitative easing 2." QE1 was the Fed's somewhat forced purchase of $1.75 trillion of mortgage-backed securities during the depths of the financial crisis. Dropping interest rates to zero wasn't enough to avert the complete seizure of the lifeblood of the economy, its financial system, so the Fed put a lot of dollars in the hands of those financial institutions holding impaired housing assets. This Fed study found that it worked. Now that the economy is growing too slowly to lower the unemployment rate, and inflation remains low, the Fed decided today that QE2 was necessary to get more growth.

Posted by Pete Davis

Is there a pot of U.S. multinational money parked overseas?  Yes, approximately $2.3 tr.   Will the U.S. government temporarily lower U.S. tax rates by 85% again, as it did in 2004, so those firms will bring roughly $565 b. of it home?  No, at least not during the next two years, mainly because studies show the 2004 dividend repatriation didn't create many jobs here, and most of it went to buy back shares and to pay dividends.  The Senate rejected it in early 2009.  President Obama opposes it, and, even if the Republicans take Congress, they won't have enough votes to overcome a Senate filibuster or a veto.

Posted by Pete Davis

Taxpayers will pay a very stiff price for allowing the government to over-encourage homeownership.  Early this afternoon, the Federal Housing Finance Agency released estimates that through 2013, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will draw between $221 billion and $363 billion from the Treasury under three different economic scenarios.  Since they were taken over on September 7, 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have drawn $148 billion.  Cleaning up this mess will take well beyond 2013, so these costs could rise higher.

Posted by Pete Davis

Today, the National Retail Federation released a study by Ernst & Young and Tax Policy Advisers that analyzes a 10.3% narrowly based "add-on" value added tax to reduce the deficit by 2% of GDP. It estimated a $2.5 trillion reduction in retail spending over the next decade and an initial loss of 850,000 of which 700,000 would be lost permanently. That's the kind of scary analysis you want if you want to kill a proposal. I would note that any federal tax increase of 2% of GDP would have similar results, although with less impact on the retail sector.



Recent comments


Advertising


Order from Amazon


Copyright

Creative Commons LicenseThe content of CapitalGainsandGames.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Need permissions beyond the scope of this license? Please submit a request here.