StanCollender'sCapitalGainsandGames Washington, Wall Street and Everything in Between

Real War Game At Pentagon Is 2010 Budget

10 Aug 2008
Posted by Stan Collender

A story yesterday on the local Washington, D.C. all-news radio station indicated that the Pentagon has been running simulations -- war games -- on what a U.S. war with Iran would look like. 

But according to this excellent article by Gordon Adams, the real war the Pentagon is planning for right now is the 2010 military budget.

Adams, who has long been considered one of the best military budget analysts around, makes a number of key points.

First, while all civilian agencies have been told not to prepare a real budget for next year, the Pentagon (along with Homeland Security, State, and the Agency for international Development) is being allowed (or is it can't be stopped?) to come up with a formal 2010 spending plan that includes policy choices for the coming year.  The strategy is to make it difficult for the next president to come up with a budget that spends less because he will look like he's underfunding the military.

Second, DOD is trying to rework it's baseline so that the much what we have been told up to now is "one-time" spending for Iraq and Afghanistan becomes permanent.  If successful, this would eliminate much of the peace dividend that both John McCain and Barack Obama say they will use to pay for everything else they want to do on taxes and spending.

Even without these games, the military budget was always going to be a big battleground next year.  And that's not including the potential dollar costs if the U.S. does engage with Iran at the same time it is fighting other wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

For example, it is becoming increasing clear that the current level of military pay is not enough to get people to enlist or re-enlist in the numbers the Pentagon needs.  As many military families will tell you, the low level of benefits have become a strong disincentive for people to stay in uniform.

We've also known for over a decade that, even without the activities in Iraq and Afghanistan, there was going to be a real need to replace and upgrade equipment this decade.

Adams mentions another: "mission creep," that is, the growing requirement that the military do things such as building "clinics, schools, wells, and roads," and deal with "natural and pandemic disasters and a growing competititionf or resources" that are beyond the Pentagon's core competence.  Whether or not these need to be done is one question.  The other is whether they should be done by the Pentagon and built into it's budget.

But the most important point Adams makes is in the first paragraph when he says that the new president won't have much time to deal with this situation.  If the new administration and Congress doesn't deal with it immediately, the new baseline that will likely be approved and the momemtum created by the Pentagon's 2010 budget will make it very hard to make anything budget marginal changes in the following years even if all activities in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iran have ended. 

Military budgets

I am not an expert by any stretch but it was my experience that out year budget proposals were submitted years in advance (5 years minimum) and modified each year until the budget became approved for the year in question. Also each year we would go out with unfunded requests that may be required due to unexpected mission changes.

Green Cars for all and Spur GMAC financing.

What the government should do is offer car vouchers to all registered
car owners who are driving cars older than 12 years old. The vouchers
would/could be for new cars only. Now that the government is part owner
of the auto industry, this would spur sales and keep the big3 moving in
the right direction to liquidate inventorie and remove the OLD gas hogs.
I know from my own experience that I would use it. Could create some
financial enhancements for GMAC as well. Why are the people at the top
not thinking like the small guy. What's best for each human being and
for the planet. Basics.

P.S. This is also for those with less than 600 fico. Not for the lenders
that are hording the bail out funds STILL.

Rich in Omaha

Recent comments


Order from Amazon


Creative Commons LicenseThe content of is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Need permissions beyond the scope of this license? Please submit a request here.