StanCollender'sCapitalGainsandGames Washington, Wall Street and Everything in Between

Did Boehner Grow A Pair Or Just Rent Them?

16 Dec 2013
Posted by Stan Collender

It's been less than a week since House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) surprised the political world by publicly and directly taking on the right wing groups -- and, by inference, the tea party wing of the GOP -- two days in a row. He then openly defied them by allowing the House to vote on a budget deal that was a compromise with Democrats they didn't like.

Four days later the question is whether this was a permanent change for Boehner. Will he continue to tell the tea partiers in his caucus, the Club for Growth, Heritage Action and the others he so resoundingly criticized that they can go to hell, or was this a one-time event not likely to be repeated?

The indications are that this was a not permanent change in the speaker's political testosterone level. Here's why.

1. The budget deal was the perfect situation for Boehner to come out swinging. The House GOP caucus was split differently on the budget than it had been at any time since the tea partiers came to prominence in the 2010 election with most members of the appropriations committee being an influential faction. That gave Boehner the comfort of knowing that he had some significant support before the fight began. It also gave him a numerical counterpart to the tea party wing that he could rely on.

2. As one of the two people doing the negotiating, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) gave Boehner political cover for agreeing to the deal.

3. The White House may have been involved behind the scenes, but the president played no public role in the negotiations that produced the deal. This was important: Obama is so anathema to so many members of Boehner's caucus that just the hint of his being part of the discussions would have made it all but impossible for many House Republicans to vote for it.

4. The government shutdown the tea partiers and conservative groups are now widely and routinely blamed for was unsuccessful from virtually every angle and the tea partiers' approval rating is at one of its lowest levels ever. They were, in other words, politically ripe for the picking.

5. This was a small and, by federal budget standards at least, relatively noncontroversial deal that did not challenge anyones major budget priorities in a big way.

Few of these these factors will exist in the future.

1. The GOP appropriators who gave Boehner some numerical safety when considering this deal will not be as prominent on other issues.

2. Ryan has already backtracked from some of the Boehner-led criticism of the conservative groups. Given his presumed political ambitions, it's hard to see Ryan wanting to do much that will further alienate this wing of the Republican Party.

3. The White House is virtually guaranteed to be involved in any serious discussion of the final frontiers of the budget -- taxes, Medicare and Social Security -- and it absolutely will be involved with other big-time issues like immigration.

4. Ryan has already said that the GOP will precipitate a debt ceiling crisis next year to force congressional Democrats and the White House to go along with what it wants.

5. There's no need for another small budget deal for two more years. All the discussion will be about grand bargains and big-time policy changes.

6. The tea party wing and the groups will grow in influence next year during the 2014 Republican primaries.

In other words, it looks less like Boehner finally grew a pair of testicles than that   he simply rented them for this occasion.


Debt ceiling

Your statement about the R position on the debt ceiling is really quite inaccurate. The Sahil Kapur piece you link to is headlined: "Paul Ryan Indicates GOP Willing To Hold Debt Limit Hostage Again." That is already somewhat hyperbolic relative to what Kapur actually reports, which is that Paul Ryan says: "We don't want nothing out of this debt limit." But you make it even more exaggerated by going from "Willing to" to "will."

Especially after your rather overheated coverage of the last debt ceiling (a reminder to everyone: Stan said there was a "no better than a 50% chance" of going past 10/17 deadline), I'd think you might want to combine your very astute coverage with a slightly more cautious attitude.

Recent comments


Order from Amazon


Creative Commons LicenseThe content of is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Need permissions beyond the scope of this license? Please submit a request here.