If Not Bernanke, Who?
Ed and Bruce raise some interesting questions regarding the Bernanke nomination. I'm in the camp of those, like Brad DeLong, who think his nomination should be confirmed. As Ed suggested, if it doesn't happen, it will be mostly because of the perceived political need to throw someone or someones under the bus.
But I disagree with Bruce, who said "...there is no obvious replacement for Bernanke who could get confirmed any more easily than him."
The key qualifications would be someone who:
- Knows Wall Street but clearly isn't from there, or from there recently
- Wasn't associated with AIG, TARP, and everything else that's already been tried
- Is considered to be strong, smart, and independent
- Is a good communicator and can make the case to a non-Wall Street audience about why what's being done is important to them
- Can handle the rough and tumble of Washington in the current bitter political environment
There are likely others, but this leads me to three names:
Former Comptroller General David Walker. My guess is that he'd jump at the opportunity. He's a former Republican and now an Independent, which would be a plus. David's zealousness about the deficit rubs some people the wrong way, but his devotion to reducing it would be a political asset, especially if, as Fed chairman, he would have to support policies that make stimulus a higher priority this year. And his extensive participation on the Fiscal Wakeup Tour while he was comptroller general, which was featured in the movie IOUSA, makes him a man of the people rather than of Wall Street.
Here's the interview 60 Minutes did with Walker in 2007.

Who, indeed?
Paul's too old and I seriously doubt he has the slightest interest in going back to the same job he once held. But there's no doubt that he would be confirmed.
David's a fiscal guy, not a monetary guy. He also has one of the world's best jobs. I can see him doing lots of things, but becoming Fed chairman isn't one of them,
That leaves Janet, whom I forgot about when writing originally. If I were a monetary dove I think she is the most viable alternative to Bernanke. But I still think Ben will be confirmed, eventually.
Yellen
Yellen is the only one of those who has the possibility of being better than Ben.
I don't know why people are so enamored of Volcker. Raising interest rates into the double digits in the middle of an oil shock when investment in oil alternatives was critcial seems over the top to me. Fortunately, the Carter administration was able to get enough carrots and sticks into their energy policy to end the oil shock and whip inflation.
Walker YGTBKM
An improvement would be someone who is much more committed to regulatory reform and willing to protect consumer banking. Too big finance does not make our world better. It is simply a ruse to extract more blood from the turnips on the bottom of the economic pile. The speculative avenues for making money from bubbles should be shut down so investment flows instead to projects that will give sustainable long term returns on investment.
Try These Three
Economist Lawrence White
Economist George Selgin
Economist Gerald O'Driscoll, Jr.
Replacement for Bernanke
Does Stan Fisher have a U.S. passport?
Walker?
Walker is not an economist and certainly not an expert in monetary policy. I shudder to think of what might have happened had he been at the helm when markets started melting down in 2008.
Janet is wonderful and absolutely brilliant, but has no Wall Street experience (so her nomination would roil financial markets) and may not be forceful enough to control the FOMC.
I'd rather keep Bernanke and find a replacement for Tim Geithner. Larry Summers is underemployed at NEC and was a pretty good Treasury Secretary.
John Taylor -- whose rule Bernanke ignored
John Taylor is the best conventional candidate.
http://alephblog.com/2010/01/23/why-bernanke-doesnt-matter-so-vote-him-d...