Good New and Bad News from Today's Social Security and Medicare Trustees Report

At 2 p.m. today, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson presented the annual Social Security and Medicare Trustees Report. The good news is that the solvency of the trust funds hasn't changed much over the past year. The Social Security Trust Fund will remain solvent until 2041, and the Medicare Trust Fund until 2019.

Most Americans believe Social Security won't pay equal-value benefits in the future. Most Social Security experts say Social Security can be kept solvent well beyond the retirement of the Baby Boomers over the next 20 years with relatively modest changes to the GROWTH of future benefits and to payroll tax rates. Even if nothing were done, after 2041, Social Security could still pay 75 cents per dollar of benefits due into the future.

The bad news is that little time remains to restore the Medicare Trust Fund to solvency. It's going cashflow negative this year. That is benefit payments will exceed payroll tax revenues starting this year. Some drastic benefit cuts and/or payroll tax increases will be needed soon if Medicare is to remain solvent. The program is open-ended and woefully lacking in efficiency. It costs twice as much to deliver the same health outcomes to Medicare beneficiaries at the UCLA Medical Center in Los Angeles, CA as it does at the Mayo Clinic, in Rochester, MN. When Congressional Budget Office Director Peter Orszag recently asked the CBO panel of health experts what savings could be achieved in Medicare without diminishing health outcomes, the estimates ranged from between one-third and and two-thirds with an average of about half. They also agreed that the aging of our population is not the cause of our runaway health care costs; it's the rapidly rising cost per beneficiary that is the problem.

Former Congressional Budget Office Director Rudy Penner published excellent analysis last week on the fiscal challenge we face from Social Security and Mediare. He concluded we won't grow our way out of these problems and that the sooner we face up to Social Security and Medicare reforms, the better.

So remember, how we provide health care is the cause of our fiscal problem, not the aging of our population.

Social Security Meltdown

I do not believe the rosy projections. Without dramatic increases in payroll taxes or delays in when we can start collecting Social Security, the ability of workers to support retirees will fail within 20 years. This is due to better health care and increased longevity of retirees, the upcoming retirement of a big proportion (the baby boomers) of the highest paid workers, the effects of low childbirth rates for the past 40 years, and a probable lower rate of productivity increases. I've always felt that Social Security was a Ponzi scheme. My wife and I started our financial planning 20 years ago with the belief that we would get no Social Security benefits. I believe that 15 years from now (when I'm 67), Social Security will be floundering and will do what Medicare did: restrict or eliminate the benefits of the wealthiest retirees. I feel we should phase out Social Security and gradually eliminate the tax. (This would take about 20 years.) Workers should dump the 'extra' money into personal retirement accounts. If not, they will get to work until they die or live in cheap retirement barracks.

Medicare is clearly a big

Medicare is clearly a big problem that needs to get fixed quickly, and it won't be easy. Social Security MIGHT run a little bit short in thirty years, although projections have ALWAYS been too conservative. I would love to see an interactive gadget that lets you tinker with the assumptions behind the forecasts and see what happens. In particular, I'd love to know what would happen if: - we kept current rates of legal immigration (I think the trustees assume much lower rates), - we assume minimum wage levels will increase with inflation, - we increase productivity just a little bit, - we raise eligibility by a year or two, and - we stick five percent or so of the trust fund into stock market index funds and/or other government bonds. I bet that would pretty much solve the problem for us, but would love to have someone wonkier than me set me straight if I'm wrong.

Social Security and Medicare Trustees Report

Excellent suggestions.  The Trustees do some sensitivity testing, but I wish they could get the budget to do more.

Very helpful, thanks!!

Very helpful, thanks!!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.