Today, the Senate turned to the Federal Aviation Administration authorization, H.R.1586. The last four-year authorization expired September 30, 2007. What caused this 2½ year delay? Congress couldn't agree on how to apportion the excise and ticket taxes to pay for a desperately needed modernization of the air traffic control system. Your car has GPS. Your phone has GPS. Commercial airliners have GPS, but the air traffic control system still relies on radar and radio position reports. That costs billions of dollars in extra miles traveled every year. The airlines correctly believe they pay more than their fair share of the costs, but private pilots (I used to be one.) have more political clout and refuse to share more costs. Then there's the problem of Memphis, TN-based Fedex's avoidance of a union for its workers, which puts it at an advantage over its main competitor, unionized United Parcel Service. The House version of H.R.1586 would apply existing labor laws equally to both companies, but that prompted Tennessee Senators Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Bob Corker (R-TN) to hold up the bill.

Richard J. Ablin is the University of Arizona research professor who discovered the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in 1970. Today, in a New York Times op-ed, he decried the misuse of that test by health care monopolies to drive up profits with promises of catching prostate cancer early. First of all, the test can't detect cancer. Screening most men over age 50 costs over $3 billion a year, but has been proven in two recent studies to have little or no effect on life expectancy. Only 16% of men will ever be diagnosed with prostate cancer and only 3% will ever die of it. A European study concluded 47 men suffer grievous treatments that result in loss of sexual activity and incontinence for each life saved. Professional associations are beginning to recommend against PSA tests, but not those captive of the drug companies. Ablin concluded, "I never dreamed that my discovery four decades ago would lead to such a profit-driven public health disaster. The medical community must confront reality and stop the inappropriate use of P.S.A. screening.

"Reconciliation" is getting a lot of attention in Washington lately. Most understand a reconciliation bill can pass the Senate by majority vote after 20 hours of debate, but that's often where the understanding stops. Reconciliation originated in the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 as an optional means of changing (mostly) entitlement spending, but not Social Security, and taxes to achieve the deficit target set forth in the budget resolution. Because a reconciliation bill has a high likelihood of becoming law, it quickly became a magnet for extraneous amendments, which Senator Robert C. Byrd (D-WV) deterred in 1985 with the Byrd Rule, now Section 313 of the Budget Act, which lays out six criteria for determining what is extraneous. Implementing these rules in the Senate has become so complicated that no one can be entirely sure of what will emerge until the Senate Parliamentarian has ruled.

Congressional Budget Office Director Doug Elmendorf addressed the National Economists Club luncheon today in D.C. He started with the good news: "In the near term (FY10-FY12), we expect the economy to recover." However, his job outlook was grim: "More pain of unemployment lies ahead of us than behind us." That's because this recession has had much more permanent job loss than past recessions and because our recovery is likely to be weak, with subpar job growth. We've lost 8.5 million jobs so far, and it would take 11 million new jobs to reach the level we would have had if the recession hadn't occurred. He expects the unemployment rate to drop to 5% by FY13, but, "That's a long ways away."

 I applaud the tax reform proposal just put forth by Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Judd Gregg (R-NH). Lowering the top corporate tax rate is very important for improving the competitiveness of our exports, and keeping the top individual rate at 35% while repealing the dysfunctional Alternative Minimum Tax is an achievement in itself.

Today, as promised, President Obama released his new health reform proposal three days in advance of Thursday's Blair House summit. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said he will attend, so at least some Republicans will be there. It's anybody's guess whether we get health reform this year. To me, it looks like we'll either get a watered down bill or nothing but more political posturing. I'll bet every Congress for the next 10 years passes another health reform bill too. I just hope we don't end up with the aimless policymaking like we've had with energy legislation since the 1973 energy crisis.

It's too early to get our hopes up for sustained Senate bipartisanship, but just before 6 p.m. tonight, five Republicans joined 57 Democrats to invoke cloture on Senator Harry Reid's (D-NV) amendment to the House jobs bill, H.R.2847. Newly elected Scott Brown (R-MA), Kit Bond (R-MO), Sue Collins (R-ME), Olympia Snow (R-ME), and George Voinovitch (R-OH) voted with the Democrats. Ben Nelson (D-NE) was the only Democrat to vote with the Republicans. Not voting were Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), who is hospitalized for stomach cancer, and eight Republicans, who ducked the vote. So far, Reid's amendment would be limited to $12 b. FY10-FY12, and it's "paid for" over 10 years, but amendments could add to that, and it will grow larger in any compromise with the House's $65 b. FY10-FY19 bill.

Before every major Hill hearing, staff prepare a briefing book for the Chair with simulated Q&A and background information. I imagine the following for next Wednesday morning's Humphrey-Hawkins hearing with Fed Chair Ben Bernanke.

 Q. from Chair Barney Frank: "Mr. Bernanke, where are the jobs?"

 I too attended yesterday's Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform Policy Forum, and I highly recommend that you watch it for several reasons:

 We certainly aren't acting like it. It's time to reflect when good people -- well liked on both sides of the aisle and certain to be reelected -- bow out. Senator Evan Bayh's (D-IN) retirement announcement today was a shocker. Read his statement. I would lift up: