A New Twist on the Ownership Society

As of this morning, we -- the taxpayers -- apparently own Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Here's the press release from the Treasury, including remarks by Secretary Paulson and FHFA Director Lockhart.  I'm still catching up on the news, but this statement by Paulson caught my eye:

Based on what we have learned about these institutions over the last four weeks – including what we learned about their capital requirements – and given the condition of financial markets today, I concluded that it would not have been in the best interest of the taxpayers for Treasury to simply make an equity investment in these enterprises in their current form.

I would go even further.  The government should never make an ad hoc loan to any financial entity that has been guilty of malfeasance.  The equity holders of the entity should have their claims wiped out.  The managers who had been acting on behalf of those entities should be removed (and prosecuted as necessary).  If liquidity is needed, the government should make loans to other entities whose balance sheets may be compromised by the bad actor's prior actions or to a new financial sponsor for the remains of the bad actor's balance sheet.  And new procedures must then be put in place to protect taxpayers from similar crises in the future.

From what I've seen this year, first with Bear Stearns and now with the GSEs, the Bernanke Fed and Paulson Treasury seem to be following these prescriptions pretty well.

Ownership convenience.

If wealthy special interests can own it and gouge the public for obscene profits, it is something to privatize and they can own it.

If it loses money big time, then the public has to bail it out and the public owns the loss.

Privatization is one feature of a government of by and for special interests.

No other choice

The international US creditors own tons of those securities . . . so I guess they own us. Now let's see what happens -- further fall of the dollar, further inflation, job losses, more foreclosures, more bailouts -- a repeating cycle?

I'm not an economist but this looks like a train wreck to me. The fact that this was necessary BEFORE the election speaks volumes about how bad it is. They were trying to wait to dump it on the next admin but couldn't.

Expanding the clawback rule

Another simple change to enact is to change the bankruptcy/receivership clawback rules to include any management bonuses or stock grants/option sales for the previous 5 years.

Today, if a company going into bankruptcy pays a bill to a creditor, that payment can be pulled back and distributed evenly to creditors. Payments to failed managers should be included in these clawbacks.

Reboot

Time to reboot the system

Arnold Kling on the FMs

MIT Phd and former Freddie economist onwhere we are now.

Lehman Brothers next bailout

They're going down right now.

Word is the Koreans don't want to buy their bad debt.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options